What system is worth understanding, and what is actually happening underneath it?
It began as one longer sentence, in Preferred Problem Spaces: what system is worth understanding, what is actually happening underneath its observable behavior, and how deeply can I go before that understanding turns into something useful?
- Still open
- How deeply can I go before that understanding turns into something useful?
What I think now
So for me, it is always about the problem space.
from Preferred Problem Spaces, Sep 2026
I am naturally drawn towards systems with dynamics, interactions, feedback, uncertainty, adaptation, hidden structure, and emergence, especially when there is enough room to combine scientific thinking with engineering and experimentation.
from Preferred Problem Spaces, Sep 2026
What's beneath it
- Preferred Problem Spacesan essay · Sep 2026
- Causal State-Space Modelsa build
- HMV-CRLa build
- Complex Systems, Not Integrationsan article · Sep 2026
What changed my mind
An EV telemetry capstone could simply remain an analytics project: ingest data, calculate efficiency, build a model, and create a dashboard. But once I start asking what actually generates those signals, the problem naturally opens into multivariate time series, state estimation, dynamical systems, system identification, physics-based modeling, Koopman operators, representation learning, world models, and Physical AI. The opportunity was already inside the problem. The difference came from how deeply I chose to investigate it.
from Preferred Problem Spaces, Sep 2026
Still open
How deeply can I go before that understanding turns into something useful? It is the last part of the original sentence, and the part still unanswered.
What others have said
No replies yet. When someone writes back and is glad for it to be shown, their reply goes here with their name.
Have a better answer, or a better question? Write back. Write to mepc3197@columbia.edu · the title goes in the subject line